the bastards' last stand

In its reflective reaction to everything Trump and Republican, the left continues to display its casual racism in ways that would be embarrassing with even a smidgen of self-awareness. They lack self-awareness because they always unquestioningly start with the conclusion that anything they support is good. Relevant to this piece, the left has come out in opposition to the Trump administration fighting crime--especially if it is primarily perpetrated by and against black urban residents. They also support our national museums that promote "whiteness" as an intrinsic bad. President Trump has dispatched the National Guard and temporarily taken over policing in Washington, D.C.--in the nation's top 10 highest murder rates. He has also begun removing DEI and what he calls divisiveness from the Smithsonian. It is worth noting that the Smithsonian portrays hard work and rational thinking as aspects of this inherently bad whiteness. With this in mind, the left's approach to c...

The phrase "grasping at straws," from Sir Thomas More's proverb, "A drowning man will clutch at straw," captures a desperate, futile attempt to avoid an inevitable end. It evokes a person falling off a cliff, frantically grabbing for anything to halt their doom. In cinema, this creates tension as the hero snatches a sturdy shrub at the last second. In politics, it signals a refusal to face reality. The Democrats' new $20 million Speaking With American Men (SAM) initiative to attract male voters is a textbook example. This effort is less substantial than straw, likely pushing men further away. It delays confronting the obvious: the party's positions alienate men, offer little to women beyond abortion, and oppose the interests of native-born Americans-- also know as voters. A late May New York Times article by Shane Goldmacher highlights the Democrat's struggle to recover from Trump's re-election. He notes, "Democratic donors and strategists ...

Democrats, seemingly resigned to political irrelevance, have shifted from principled opposition to obstructionism. They are seeking to stall or block the Trump administration's fulfillment of voter will.  In the face of popular demand for mass deportation of illegal aliens they have positioned themselves as self-appointed experts on due process. Their demands for due process might hold greater totemic power if not undermined by apparent hypocrisy, having supported limited due process for January 6 defendants. The demand for due process is desperate political opportunism driven by faulty political calculus. This explains why a US senator and congressional representatives traveled to El Salvador over a single deported alien. They are demanding that illegal aliens receive more vetting for deportation than they received on entering the country under Biden. In 2016, 38% of Americans supported deporting all undocumented immigrants. Today that number is 56% . There is nothing quite like i...

It has been somewhat difficult to place the opposition to Trump in a context where it all makes sense. The simplest explanation behind the difficulty is that there is no sense behind it. This is not to suggest that there is no sense in opposing Trump, although there is an argument to be made. There are no rational goals behind the opposition. His platform is more popular than he is. This opposition is not a response to what he is doing meant to generate support for Democrats. It is sound and fury, which may come to signify far more than is wished.  Instead of considering the opposition to DOGE, his sex recognition, DEI, and deportation Executive Orders as separate, it is better to see it all as a continuous spectrum. The most consistent element is that the opposition, lacking any principle, reacts to everything as if it is the one thing that will finally bring Trump down. In so doing, they select positions that are overwhelmingly unpopular. Being met with apathy seems to only ...

Immediately upon his second inauguration, President Trump set out to fulfill his campaign promises through executive orders. Among his commitments was to shrink the federal workforce, especially of those who have continued to work from home post-COVID. Among the government workers fired were 3-400 Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) workers. Since the inauguration there have been a number of shocking airplane collisions and and near misses, starting just 9 days after the inauguration. On January 29 a US Black Hawk helicopter collided with a civilian jet near Ronald Reagan Airport. With each incident, the media returned to the question of how much the FAA staff cuts were responsible for what began to seem like an unprecedented number of accidents in a president's first two months.  The media coverage of this topic highlights the media and Democrat's approach to everything Trump does. It is not about the subject, it is always about the fact that it has happened under or because...

Starting immediately after Donald Trump's second win for the presidency, I saw Facebook post after post asking, "Why is this happening?" Because the answer is so obvious to me, I offered it. Several of the women asking the question blocked me, which has made clear the question isn't genuine. It should be. The actual question is, "Why was Trump's resounding win so surprising?" Through polling we knew the issues most important to the electorate. Agree or disagree with his solutions, Trump spoke about addressing those issues. Kamala employed Hillary Clinton's campaign strategy, she focused on Trump. One strategy spoke directly to voters. The other spoke directly to the legacy media, which ignored the issues most important to voters. For that reason, Kamala supporters, which includes those who have the highest trust in legacy media, especially those working in the industry, were the most surprised by the outcome. The short answer to why Trump won is that...